<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Problems With Lazy Project Managers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sudospeak.com/managers/top-problems-with-lazy-project-managers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sudospeak.com/managers/top-problems-with-lazy-project-managers/</link>
	<description>Bridging the gap between Managers and Engineers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Fey</title>
		<link>http://www.sudospeak.com/managers/top-problems-with-lazy-project-managers/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Fey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sudospeak.com/?p=253#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Hey Peter!

Thanks for the comment!  I must wholeheartedly agree that there are, indeed, doing the wrong sort of laziness.  To be *effectively* lazy, you must at least put forth the impression to the rest of your team that you are getting things done!  Obviously work follows that, because without actually following-through with things you promise, the illusion dissipates.

I, however, am ALL for being lazy when you have the capability and the means to be so!  If you can find a way in ten minutes to automate a ten hour project, then you would have to be a moron not to take the lazy way out!

Thanks again!
C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Peter!</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!  I must wholeheartedly agree that there are, indeed, doing the wrong sort of laziness.  To be *effectively* lazy, you must at least put forth the impression to the rest of your team that you are getting things done!  Obviously work follows that, because without actually following-through with things you promise, the illusion dissipates.</p>
<p>I, however, am ALL for being lazy when you have the capability and the means to be so!  If you can find a way in ten minutes to automate a ten hour project, then you would have to be a moron not to take the lazy way out!</p>
<p>Thanks again!<br />
C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.sudospeak.com/managers/top-problems-with-lazy-project-managers/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sudospeak.com/?p=253#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Yes - they are suffering from the &#039;wrong sort of laziness&#039;

Check out my site for the &#039;Art of Productive Laziness&#039;

Progress isn&#039;t made by wise men; it is made by lazy men trying to find easier ways to do something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; they are suffering from the &#8216;wrong sort of laziness&#8217;</p>
<p>Check out my site for the &#8216;Art of Productive Laziness&#8217;</p>
<p>Progress isn&#8217;t made by wise men; it is made by lazy men trying to find easier ways to do something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
